Uncle Michael - you mentioned alternatives for I/O - like the digital and opto-isolated relays - of StarGate.
Have you made any further changes in that area?
Once I step off of my ever-shrinking ice-flow that is the most excellent (but near-extinct) StarGate, I am very concerned about stepping onto something that will be bigger, better, more stable, growing-not-shrinking, and MORE features, not less, than SG.
I suspect as I start really investing and investigating, many things will find their own replacement solutions. Problem is that each is "mo money" than what the original solution was. Why is it more, rather than less, to do the same function nearly 20 years later? And of course, there are exceptions to that. AND there are some very nice enhancements that were not available in 1997.
Have you made any further changes in that area?
Once I step off of my ever-shrinking ice-flow that is the most excellent (but near-extinct) StarGate, I am very concerned about stepping onto something that will be bigger, better, more stable, growing-not-shrinking, and MORE features, not less, than SG.
I suspect as I start really investing and investigating, many things will find their own replacement solutions. Problem is that each is "mo money" than what the original solution was. Why is it more, rather than less, to do the same function nearly 20 years later? And of course, there are exceptions to that. AND there are some very nice enhancements that were not available in 1997.
Comment