Are you going to do the timed event handling in script?
What are you using for your flash user interface? Is is home-grown or a commercial package?
I have used the US equivalent of the CM-67 and it works good except for the programming which requires use of the users manual each time to figure out how to do it.
I now have the HAI-80 primarily because of the difficult programmabilty of the Honeywell one.
The modern digital thermostats of which I'm familiar will modulate the control to give the walls time to absorb the heat and reduce the chance of overshoot in the control.
My Honeywell unit was rather smart and only modulated the heat control when it became close to the target and then it changed the frequency of modulation. The HAI-80 just modulates continuously. I suspect that the Honeywell is actually more efficient and may be easier on the furnace as well.
When I started down the mcsControlSystems road a few years back I was going down the path of a PID controller that took into account the room heating characteristcs and the external influence of sunlight. It would learn the room heat transfer characteristics based upon outside temp and furnace energy to calibrate the PID gains and model the sunlight as an external disturbance. My interest disipated and I probably will never get back to it since I do not have a good use that justifies the effort.
If you have any interest in xAP then you can get a nice control chart that shows control to limits and cumulative ON time for the control. It makes it easy to see how well the control is working and any overshoot that may exist. It may be too much effort for you to setup, but just mentioning it. I do not plan to retrofit this type of chart into mcsTemperature. I posted one version at http://board.homeseer.com/showthread...ht=Temperature
What are you using for your flash user interface? Is is home-grown or a commercial package?
I have used the US equivalent of the CM-67 and it works good except for the programming which requires use of the users manual each time to figure out how to do it.
I now have the HAI-80 primarily because of the difficult programmabilty of the Honeywell one.
The modern digital thermostats of which I'm familiar will modulate the control to give the walls time to absorb the heat and reduce the chance of overshoot in the control.
My Honeywell unit was rather smart and only modulated the heat control when it became close to the target and then it changed the frequency of modulation. The HAI-80 just modulates continuously. I suspect that the Honeywell is actually more efficient and may be easier on the furnace as well.
When I started down the mcsControlSystems road a few years back I was going down the path of a PID controller that took into account the room heating characteristcs and the external influence of sunlight. It would learn the room heat transfer characteristics based upon outside temp and furnace energy to calibrate the PID gains and model the sunlight as an external disturbance. My interest disipated and I probably will never get back to it since I do not have a good use that justifies the effort.
If you have any interest in xAP then you can get a nice control chart that shows control to limits and cumulative ON time for the control. It makes it easy to see how well the control is working and any overshoot that may exist. It may be too much effort for you to setup, but just mentioning it. I do not plan to retrofit this type of chart into mcsTemperature. I posted one version at http://board.homeseer.com/showthread...ht=Temperature
Comment