Hello Michael,
I bought GR101.
I have a concern.
RFreceiver is OK :
40D36C421406388406 WEIGHT2[6] GR101 0684380614426CD3 Weight: 24900 = 62.1 kg bits=64
Windows I/O XapMcsRf :
17:45:13 | 40, D3, 6C, 42, 14
17:45:13 | 06, 3D, 04, 08 | Discarding D3 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 6C while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 42 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 14 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 06 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 3D while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 04 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 08 while trying to sync on byte-count byte
17:45:13 | 40
17:45:13 | D3, 6C, 42, 14, 06, 3D, 04
17:45:13 | 08 | Discarding D3 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 6C while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 42 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 14 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 06 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 3D while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 04 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 08 while trying to sync on byte-count byte
17:45:14 | 40, D3, 6C, 42, 14, 06, 3D
17:45:14 | 04, 08 | Discarding D3 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 6C while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 42 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 14 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 06 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 3D while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 04 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 08 while trying to sync on byte-count byte
17:45:15 | 40, D3, 6C
17:45:15 | 42, 14, 06, 3D, 04, 08 | Discarding D3 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 6C while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 42 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 14 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 06 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 3D while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 04 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 08 while trying to sync on byte-count byte
17:45:15 | 40, D3, 6C, 42, 14, 06
17:45:15 | 3D, 04, 08 | Discarding D3 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 6C while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 42 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 14 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 06 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 3D while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 04 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 08 while trying to sync on byte-count byte
17:45:16 | 40
17:45:16 | D3, 6C, 42, 14, 06, 3D, 04, 08 | Discarding D3 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 6C while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 42 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 14 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 06 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 3D while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 04 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 08 while trying to sync on byte-count byte
17:45:16 | 40, D3, 6C, 42, 14
17:45:16 | 06, 3D, 04, 08 | Discarding D3 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 6C while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 42 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 14 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 06 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 3D while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 04 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 08 while trying to sync on byte-count byte
Can you help me ?
<!-- / message --><!-- edit note -->
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
xapmcsRF - W800 / RFXCOM xAP Node
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Guest replied
-
Yes it is compatible. The decode is present in xapmcsRF. I do not recall if anybody has yet tested it with xapmcsRF, but if there are any issues they will be very easy to resove when real data is available.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedGr101
I will buy Oregon scientific GR101
is what it is compatible with RFXCOM and xapmcsrf ?
many people ask themselves the question.
There is a big market in France from Oregon Scientific.
Thank you for your reply
(sorry for my English approximate)
greetings
Leave a comment:
-
The variable ID is my coding problem and I fixed it and uploaded it. For the remainder of the information you will need to get back to Bert as I have implemented all that he had defined as of Rev 11.3 of the OS formats. There were many ? in the decode for this device.
Leave a comment:
-
Hello michael,
The probe is now recognized but works strangly.
Probe report only Temp , Humidity , and Battery status , no time , no mode (comfort,wet,dry)
for sure this is not critical , the most important is temp and humidity of course
the second strange thing is each time it detect the probe 5 times with 5 different ID ?? (see pic)
same for humidity and battery but all have the same value.
This probe has a large advantage compared to the others Oregon i have, it less frequently "speaks" (1 time each 60 second) What limits the collisions when have a lot of probe.
Anyway thanks for this update Michael.
Leave a comment:
-
Hello michael,
The probe is now recognized but works strangly.
Probe report only Temp , Humidity , and Battery status , no time , no mode (comfort,wet,dry)
for sure this is not critical , the most important is temp and humidity of course
the second strange thing is that:
each time it detect the probe 5 times with 5 different ID ??
same for humidity and battery but all have the same value.
This probe has a large advantage compared to the others Oregon i have, it less frequently "speaks" (1 time each 60 second) What limits the collisions when have a lot of probe.
Anyway thanks for this update Michael.
Leave a comment:
-
Hello michael,
The probe is now recognized but works strangly.
Probe report only Temp , Humidity , and Battery status , no time , no mode (comfort,wet,dry)
for sure this is not critical , the most important is temp and humidity of course
the second strange thing is that:
each time it detect the probe 5 times with 5 different ID ??
same for humidity and battery but all have the same value.
This probe has a large advantage compared to the others Oregon i have, it less frequently "speaks" (1 time each 60 second) What limits the collisions when have a lot of probe.
Anyway thanks for this update Michael.
Leave a comment:
-
Hello michael,
The probe is now recognized but works strangly.
Probe report only Temp , Humidity , and Battery status , no time , no mode (comfort,wet,dry)
for sure this is not critical , the most important is temp and humidity of course
the second strange thing is that:
each time it detect the probe 5 times with 5 different ID ??
same for humidity and battery but all have the same value.
This probe has a large advantage compared to the others Oregon i have, it less frequently "speaks" (1 time each 60 second) What limits the collisions when have a lot of probe.
Anyway thanks for this update Michael.
Leave a comment:
-
Hello michael,
The probe is now recognized but works strangly.
Probe report only Temp , Humidity , and Battery status , no time , no mode (comfort,wet,dry)
for sure this is not critical , the most important is temp and humidity of course
the second strange thing is that:
each time it detect the probe 5 times with 5 different ID ??
same for humidity and battery but all have the same value.
This probe has a large advantage compared to the others Oregon i have, it less frequently "speaks" (1 time each 60 second) What limits the collisions when have a lot of probe.
Anyway thanks for this update Michael.
Leave a comment:
-
This one is an oddball with only a 12 bit ID and a variable packet size. I made the changes in V1.10.0 at http://mcsSprinklers.com/xapmcsRF.zip. Please confirm it works as expected.
Leave a comment:
-
Hello Michael,
I bought a probe RTGR328N Oregon ,
it seems to have some trouble in XapMcsRf.
19:45:34 | 30, 24, 20, 46, 4C, 5F | Discarding 50 after seeing invalid ID for 80 byte packet | Discarding BA while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding CC while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 43 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 67 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 30 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 24 while trying to sync on byte-count byte
19:45:34 | 50, BA, CC, 43, 67 | Discarding 46 because byte 3 & 4 are not complements | Discarding 46 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 4C while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 5F while trying to sync on byte-count byte
19:45:34 | 30, 24, 20, 46, 4C, 5F | Discarding 50 after seeing invalid ID for 80 byte packet | Discarding BA while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding CC while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 43 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 67 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 30 while trying to sync on byte-count byte | Discarding 24 while trying to sync on byte-count byte
maybe this probe are not already implemented in Xapmcsrf because it have date and time ?
Can you help with this new probe ?
Thanks
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedversion 1.8.1 de XapMcsRF
Oregon-THGR328N work
Thank
Leave a comment:
-
I have version 8.5 or the OS RF Format from Bert which shows the following
Model: Oregon-THGR328N
Sensor id 0x????
Based upon your data for sensor ID I added it and uploaded V1.8.1
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedOregon THGR328N
Hello Michael,
I bought a probe THGR328N Oregon and a probe THGR228N.
The 228 works very well but the 328 seems to have worries in XapMcsRf.
Rfxcom 433 works well.
RFreceiver is OK :
50CA2C13C67822604653E0 TH4[50689] THGR328 CH 1 counter:12 addr:C6 temp:22.7°C | 72.86°F hum:66 Comfort bits=80
Windows I/O XapMcsRf :
13:26:44 | 50, CA, 2C
13:26:44 | 23, DC, 48, 24, 00, 46, 54, C7 | Discarding 50 after seeing invalid ID for 80 byte packet | Discarding CA while trying to sync on byte-count byte | 23DC = 36 | Digimax 54C7 Ignored because location not defined for sensor
Concern in the encoding of id ??
I asked RFXCOM send me the document : "Oregon Scientific RF format - rev 11.3"
Page 14 : TH4 - THGR328N Outside Temp-Hygro
Have you this document ?
or give me your mail.
Can you help me ?
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedHello Michael,
I have some trouble with the "Inv" function on the latest version. When I restart the application, it seems not remember the Inv option on all my switch devices (DS10 and MS10).
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: