Acrf2 ? Rfxcom ?

[TeleFragger]

so i should be lucky that I have this in my driveway...



raw v8 power..
1978 chevy 1 ton pickup
1991 caprice police roller 350
1996 vortec heads
holley truck avenger 670cfm carb
dual plane high rise vortec intake
40" hawgs
4.56 gears
4 speed with granny


all that = 11mpg and RAW POWER!!!!!!!!!!

[sooty]

Sorry to go off topic again but where I live, that vehicle would probably be targeted by some kind of eco activists and ceremoniously burned or something.

A few years ago, I had a Jeep with a 4.7-litre V8 petrol (gas) engine and it had that sound that you only seem to get from a petrol powered V8.

I got to the point where my monthly fuel bill was so bad that it just had to go. Now I have a 3-litre V6 diesel, which does more than double the MPG.

Paul..

[TeleFragger]

back on topic...


I only went rfxcom for the scale.. that is what started it all.... the new charts are a nice feature...... also helped me loose 22+lbs so far....
then the oregon temps came in handy.....

I still use the acrf2 for my ds10a as I dont have a 310mhz rfxcom unit and dont want to dish the cash out for it....

so you gotta look at what features you want.. if they are there then no need to switch... unless the rfxcom has what you want....


I know the new version of the rfxcom charts (v2?) will be out someday and will add more to it.....

however since rmasonjr hooked me up with how to log and create charts with mdb files.... I just have to learn how to use chartdirector better and create my own charts... then viola... the charts are not really a biggie to me..... unless V2 looks sweet.... (is v2 gonna be free... who knows.. alot of work going into it... so should it be free... most likely not..... )...

some other things for you to ponder...